))
23-980 Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank [11/06/24]
Manage episode 451683839 series 3618198
A tartalmat a Better Informed Network biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Better Informed Network vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
The case Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank. The case centers on whether risk disclosures in financial statements are misleading by omission if they don't mention past occurrences of the described risk. The petitioners argue that such omissions are only misleading if they create an implied representation about the past, while the respondents contend that omissions can be misleading even without explicit misrepresentation, depending on context and materiality. The justices extensively questioned both sides, exploring various hypotheticals to clarify the boundaries of securities liability for omissions in risk disclosures. The debate ultimately hinges on the interpretation of reasonable investor expectations and the interplay between materiality and falsity in securities law.
27 epizódok
Megosztás
