Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May. You can listen to the sidebar version of each Supreme Court Case https://thesidebar.transistor.fm/
…
continue reading
A public good: every Supreme Court Oral Argument since 2010. Making the Highest Court more accessible for a modern audience. The DC Bar blog's piece about this podcast can be found here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotuspod. If you'd like to support the law student who created this project instead of studying you can do so here: https://www.tinyurl.com/scotusguy. Thanks for listening! Patreon
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
Looking for entertaining basketball content without the drama? Check out The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Join Robaire, Chris, and Henri every Wednesday for the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Fur ...
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading

1
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025]
1:35:51
1:35:51
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:35:51QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act, which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonparties to obtain review of claims asserting that an agency order exceeds the agency’s statutory authority; and whether the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of…
…
continue reading
Send us a text In City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of the EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case arose when the EPA issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to San Francisco's wastewater treatment facilities, including provis…
…
continue reading
Send us a text Are you noticing the shifts in NBA dynamics this season? Join us as we explore how Luka Doncic's arrival has revitalized the Los Angeles Lakers, taking fans on an emotional journey through this thrilling NBA season. This episode dives into the intricate narratives of community engagement, recent trades, and rising tensions in the sta…
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s request to freeze billions of dollars in foreign aid for work that has already been done. The administration asked the court to block a lower-court ruling ordering the government to release the funds. It remains unclear when the aid will now be distributed. John Yang has the update.…
…
continue reading

1
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas
1:35:50
1:35:50
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:35:50A case in which the Court will decide whether a nonparty can challenge a federal agency’s “final order” under the Hobbs Act’s judicial review provision; and whether federal nuclear laws allow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private companies to store spent nuclear fuel at off-reactor sites.…
…
continue reading
NRC v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading

1
Frédéric Rioux v. His Majesty the King (41362)
1:15:33
1:15:33
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:15:33Judge Gagnon of the Court of Québec acquitted the appellant, Frédéric Rioux, of the offence of sexual assault committed between August 1 and 2, 2019, in Bonsecours. Although the Crown had laid only one charge for a sexual assault that occurred in Bonsecours, the Crown’s evidence related to two instances of sexual intercourse, one in Magog and the o…
…
continue reading
Perttu v. Richards | 02/25/25 | Docket #: 23-1324
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 [Arg: 3.4.2025]
1:31:10
1:31:10
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:31:10QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States is the proximate cause of alleged injuries to the Mexican government stemming from violence committed by drug cartels in Mexico; and whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States amounts to “aiding and abetting” illegal firearms trafficking becau…
…
continue reading

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, No. 23-1259 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
52:42
52:42
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
52:42QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended co ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network által
…
continue reading

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., No. 23-1201 [Arg: 3.3.2025]
49:24
49:24
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
49:24QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network által
…
continue reading

1
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 [Arg: 2.26.2025]
54:56
54:56
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
54:56QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in addition to pleading the other elements of an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.” ★ Support this pod…
…
continue reading

1
Perttu v. Richards, No. 23-1324 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
1:16:17
1:16:17
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:16:17QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading

1
Esteras v. U.S., No. 23-7483 [Arg: 2.25.2025]
1:15:30
1:15:30
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:15:30QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, even though Congress excluded 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz, No. 23-7809 [Arg: 2.24.2025]
1:34:31
1:34:31
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:34:31QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Article III standing requires a particularized determination of whether a specific state official will redress the plaintiff’s injury by following a favorable declaratory judgment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★Better Informed Network által
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc., the Supreme Court addressed the scope of monetary remedies under the Lanham Act. The case arose from a trademark dispute between two entities using the "Dewberry" name. The district court awarded the plaintiff not only the defendant's profits but also those of affiliated companies. …
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
1:31:09
1:31:09
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:31:09A case in which the Court will decide whether U.S. gun manufacturers can be held liable for violence in Mexico under theories of proximate causation and aiding and abetting, based on their domestic production and sale of firearms that are later trafficked to Mexican cartels.
…
continue reading

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
1:18:17
1:18:17
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:18:17Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos MexicanosSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman
52:42
52:42
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
52:42A case in which the Court will decide whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint.
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a case voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) qualifies as a "final proceeding" under Rule 60(b), allowing a district court to reopen the case. Gary Waetzig sued Halliburton for age discrimination but later dismis…
…
continue reading

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.
49:24
49:24
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
49:24A case in which the Court will decide whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
…
continue reading

1
Glossip v. Oklahoma (Criminal Trial)
11:41
11:41
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
11:41Send us a text In Glossip v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial when the prosecution knowingly fails to correct false testimony and that error could have contributed to the verdict. Richard Glossip was convicted and sentenced to death based primarily on the testimony of Justin Sneed, who claimed Gl…
…
continue reading

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman
45:15
45:15
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
45:15BLOM Bank SAL v. HonickmanSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading

1
CC/Devas Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.
42:25
42:25
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
42:25CC/Devas Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court held that plaintiffs who secure only preliminary injunctive relief before their case becomes moot do not qualify as "prevailing parties" entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b). Virginia drivers challenged the constitutionality of a law suspending licenses for unpaid court fines. A…
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Williams v. Reed, the Supreme Court rejects Alabama’s administrative-exhaustion rule, holding that states cannot require claimants to complete an allegedly delayed administrative process before filing a 42 U.S.C. §1983 lawsuit challenging that very delay. Writing for the Court, Justice Kavanaugh explains that the Alabama Supreme C…
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath, the Supreme Court unanimously affirms that E-Rate reimbursement requests qualify as “claims” under the False Claims Act (FCA). The case centers on whether federal subsidies distributed through the E-Rate program—funded by contributions from telecommunications carriers and admini…
…
continue reading
Send us a text This week's episode explores the complexities of Las Vegas, which is now attempting to reinvent itself as a family-friendly destination. Join us as we share personal stories from our latest trips and discuss the Lakers' recent dominant performance against the Denver Nuggets. Exploring the deeper charm of Las Vegas and its history Sha…
…
continue reading

1
Roger Patrick Bilodeau v. His Majesty the King (41320)
1:13:52
1:13:52
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:13:52The appellant, Roger Patrick Bilodeau, was found guilty by a jury of two counts of manslaughter for the shooting deaths of two men. He was found liable as a party under s. 21(2) of the Criminal Code, for having formed an intention to carry out an unlawful purpose common with his son, who shot the deceased. He appealed his convictions, arguing that …
…
continue reading

1
Maxime Chicoine-Joubert v. His Majesty the King (41262)
48:59
48:59
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
48:59After a jury trial before Blanchard J. of the Superior Court, the appellant, Maxime Chicoine-Joubert, was convicted of one count of second degree murder and one count of assault with a weapon. On appeal, Mr. Chicoine-Joubert argued that the judge had erred in his instructions regarding manslaughter and in his answer to questions from the jury by fa…
…
continue reading

1
His Majesty the King v. Lucas Hanrahan (41220)
1:10:42
1:10:42
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:10:42The respondent was found not guilty of sexual assault following a jury trial. Consent was the central issue. The Crown appealed the respondent’s acquittal, submitting that the trial judge erred in law by restricting Crown counsel’s examination of the complainant on her prior statements (text messages that were exchanged between the complainant and …
…
continue reading

1
His Majesty the King v. Wayne Lester Singer (41090)
2:48:41
2:48:41
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
2:48:41On March 20, 2019, at approximately 11:00 p.m., police officers received a tip that Mr. Singer was driving a truck and the caller believed that he was intoxicated. More than an hour later, an officer observed a vehicle matching the vehicle description given by the caller. The truck was parked on a residential driveway. Its lights were on and its ig…
…
continue reading

1
Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia (Day 2/2) (41061)
1:56:05
1:56:05
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:56:05The parties were married in 1999 in India. During their sixteen years of marriage, they had two children. The trial judge found that Mr. Ahluwalia was abusive during the marriage. The trial judge accepted Ms. Ahluwalia’s evidence that the parties’ relationship was characterized by a pattern of emotional and physical abuse and financial control. Ms.…
…
continue reading

1
Kuldeep Kaur Ahluwalia v. Amrit Pal Singh Ahluwalia (Day 1/2) (41061)
2:06:04
2:06:04
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
2:06:04The parties were married in 1999 in India. During their sixteen years of marriage, they had two children. The trial judge found that Mr. Ahluwalia was abusive during the marriage. The trial judge accepted Ms. Ahluwalia’s evidence that the parties’ relationship was characterized by a pattern of emotional and physical abuse and financial control. Ms.…
…
continue reading

1
Ville de Sainte-Julie v. Investissements Laroda Inc. (41036)
2:10:21
2:10:21
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
2:10:21In the 1990s, Promotion M.G. Larochelle inc. (Promotion M.G.) was involved in real estate development in Ville de Sainte-Julie (City), the applicant/cross respondent. In December 2000, the total area of Promotion M.G.’s real estate projects was 760,926.3 m2. The municipal by law on parks and playgrounds required 76,092.63 m2, that is, 10% of that a…
…
continue reading

1
His Majesty the King v. Enrico Di Paola (40777)
2:24:18
2:24:18
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
2:24:18The respondent, Enrico Di-Paola, is a construction contractor committed for trial on four charges related to a corruption and fraud matter involving an official with whom he was doing business and with whom he had a friendship. The day before his trial, Mr. Di-Paola entered into a negotiated agreement with the prosecutor to plead guilty to a charge…
…
continue reading

1
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
54:56
54:56
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
54:56A case in which the Court will decide whether a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority” to establish a prima facie case of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…
…
continue reading

1
Ames v. OH Dept. of Youth Services
47:10
47:10
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
47:10Ames v. OH Dept. of Youth ServicesSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading
Esteras v. United States | 02/25/25 | Docket #: 23-7483
…
continue reading

1
Perttu v. Richards
1:16:16
1:16:16
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:16:16A case in which the Court will decide whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim.
…
continue reading

1
Esteras v. United States
1:15:29
1:15:29
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:15:29A case in which the Court will decide whether a court may, in considering whether to revoke an individual’s supervised release and impose a prison sentence, consider factors from the law governing sentencing not mentioned in the supervised release law.
…
continue reading
Send us a text In Republic of Hungary v. Simon, the Supreme Court held the mere allegation of commingling funds doesn't satisfy the commercial nexus requirement under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)’s expropriation exception. Holocaust survivors sued Hungary and its national railway, seeking damages for property seized during World War …
…
continue reading

1
Esteras v. United States
1:04:49
1:04:49
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:04:49Esteras v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading

1
Perttu v. Richards
1:05:30
1:05:30
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:05:30Perttu v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading
Gutierrez v. Saenz | 02/24/25 | Docket #: 23-7809
…
continue reading

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz
1:34:31
1:34:31
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:34:31A case in which the Court will decide whether a Texas death-row inmate has standing to sue the state over its refusal to give him access to DNA testing pursuant to a law permitting DNA testing only when the person can prove that he would not have been convicted if the DNA testing produced exculpatory results.…
…
continue reading

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz
1:21:09
1:21:09
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:21:09Gutierrez v. SaenzSupreme Court of the United States által
…
continue reading

1
Where's The Star In All-Star?
1:30:47
1:30:47
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:30:47Send us a text The episode dives into the decline of the NBA All-Star Game, examining its wavering competitiveness and lack of engagement from players. With discussions surrounding changes in game format, player participation, and the absence of marketable stars, the hosts propose fresh ideas to revitalize this iconic basketball event. • Reflection…
…
continue reading

1
Not So Super Sunday
1:24:33
1:24:33
Lejátszás később
Lejátszás később
Listák
Tetszik
Kedvelt
1:24:33Send us a text The recent Super Bowl sparked heated discussions about the outcome of the game and the halftime performance by Kendrick Lamar. The episode further delves into the aftermath of the Lakers' trade involving Luka Doncic and explores the implications of Anthony Davis's injury on the Mav's future. • Recap of the Super Bowl and Eagles' domi…
…
continue reading