))
Tim’s New Firm & Recent Cases
Manage episode 373709539 series 3344448
A tartalmat a Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
Tim announces his new firm, Kowal Law Group, APC, and discusses some legal tech with Jeff before moving on to recent cases, including:
- Collateral orders: Longobardo v. AVCO Corp. confirms that California’s collateral order doctrine is narrower than in other jurisdictions.
- Anti-SLAPP: Park v. Nazari advises outlining the specific allegations you want to strike in the notice of your SLAPP motion.
- Is opposing counsel requiring you to identify Bates numbers in your RFP responses? You don’t have to include them in your verified responses, just a chart along with your production. Pollock v. Superior Court, No. B321229 (D2d1 Jul. 31, 2023)
- Remote trials are now authorized through 2025.
- More tentative opinions? San Diego Bar Assoc. has proposed amending rule 8.256 to expressly allow focus letters and tentative opinions.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.
Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.
The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext’s newest technology, CoCounsel, the world’s first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.
Other items discussed in the episode:
- Longobardo v. AVCO Corp., No. G062374 (Cal. Ct. App. July 11, 2023)
- Doe v. Superior Court (Cal. Supreme Ct. - July 27, 2023)
- *Park v. Nazari*, No. B320483 (D2d5 Jul. 25, 2023) Via Michael Shipley
- HNHPC, Inc. v. Dep't of Cannabis Control (Aug. 2, 2023, G061298)
- *Braugh v. Dow*, No. B311859 (D2d8 Jul. 3, 2023).
- People v. Tapa (Cal. Ct. App. - July 11, 2023) Via Ben Shatz
- Proposed rule to encourage tentatives Via Ben Shatz
- Even the Court of Appeal hates the rule that requires RFP responses to identify Bates numbers. Via Michael Shipley
- 9th Cir.: “don’t conflate an order with a document” Via Ben Shatz
- Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel.
129 epizódok
Megosztás
