Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

32 subscribers

Hozzáadva öt éve

A tartalmat a Better Informed Network biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Better Informed Network vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.

TechSurge: Deep Tech VC Podcast

1
Understanding the Elegant Math Behind Modern Machine Learning 1:14:43

14 napja1:14:43

Lejátszás később

Listák

Tetszik

Kedvelt

1:14:43

Artificial intelligence is evolving at an unprecedented pace—what does that mean for the future of technology, venture capital, business, and even our understanding of ourselves? Award-winning journalist and writer Anil Ananthaswamy joins us for our latest episode to discuss his latest book Why Machines Learn: The Elegant Math Behind Modern AI . Anil helps us explore the journey and many breakthroughs that have propelled machine learning from simple perceptrons to the sophisticated algorithms shaping today’s AI revolution, powering GPT and other models. The discussion aims to demystify some of the underlying mathematical concepts that power modern machine learning, to help everyone grasp this technology impacting our lives–even if your last math class was in high school. Anil walks us through the power of scaling laws, the shift from training to inference optimization, and the debate among AI’s pioneers about the road to AGI—should we be concerned, or are we still missing key pieces of the puzzle? The conversation also delves into AI’s philosophical implications—could understanding how machines learn help us better understand ourselves? And what challenges remain before AI systems can truly operate with agency? If you enjoy this episode, please subscribe and leave us a review on your favorite podcast platform. Sign up for our newsletter at techsurgepodcast.com for exclusive insights and updates on upcoming TechSurge Live Summits. Links: Read Why Machines Learn, Anil’s latest book on the math behind AI https://www.amazon.com/Why-Machines-Learn-Elegant-Behind/dp/0593185749 Learn more about Anil Ananthaswamy’s work and writing https://anilananthaswamy.com/ Watch Anil Ananthaswamy’s TED Talk on AI and intelligence https://www.ted.com/speakers/anil_ananthaswamy Discover the MIT Knight Science Journalism Fellowship that shaped Anil’s AI research https://ksj.mit.edu/ Understand the Perceptron, the foundation of neural networks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptron Read about the Perceptron Convergence Theorem and its significance https://www.nature.com/articles/323533a0…

körülbelül egy éve 53:20

MP3•Epizód kép

QUESTION PRESENTED:

Whether, under the discovery accrual rule applied by the circuit courts and the Copyright Act‚Äôs statute of limitations for civil actions, 17 U.S.C. ¬ß 507(b), a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit.

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

349 epizódok

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

Supreme Court of the United States

Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]

Supreme Court of the United States

32 subscribers

published körülbelül egy éve

Megosztás

MP3•Epizód kép

QUESTION PRESENTED:

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

349 epizódok

#Politics #News #Austin Songer #Government #Justice #Supreme Court #USA #United States #Docket

Minden epizód

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, No. 23-1300 [Arg: 3.5.2025] 1:35:51

21 hours1:35:51

1:35:51

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act , which authorizes a “party aggrieved” by an agency’s “final order” to petition for review in a court of appeals, allows nonparties to obtain review of claims asserting that an agency order exceeds the agency’s statutory authority; and whether the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 permit the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private entities to temporarily store spent nuclear fuel away from the nuclear-reactor sites where the spent fuel was generated. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, No. 23-1141 [Arg: 3.4.2025] 1:31:10

21 hours1:31:10

1:31:10

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States is the proximate cause of alleged injuries to the Mexican government stemming from violence committed by drug cartels in Mexico; and whether the production and sale of firearms in the United States amounts to “aiding and abetting” illegal firearms trafficking because firearms companies allegedly know that some of their products are unlawfully trafficked. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman, No. 23-1259 [Arg: 3.3.2025] 52:42

21 hours52:42

52:42

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard applies to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended co ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., No. 23-1201 [Arg: 3.3.2025] 49:24

21 hours49:24

49:24

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether plaintiffs must prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 [Arg: 2.26.2025] 54:56

21 hours54:56

54:56

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in addition to pleading the other elements of an employment discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , a majority-group plaintiff must show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Perttu v. Richards, No. 23-1324 [Arg: 2.25.2025] 1:16:17

21 hours1:16:17

1:16:17

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act , prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Esteras v. U.S., No. 23-7483 [Arg: 2.25.2025] 1:15:30

21 hours1:15:30

1:15:30

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, even though Congress excluded 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Gutierrez v. Saenz, No. 23-7809 [Arg: 2.24.2025] 1:34:31

21 hours1:34:31

1:34:31

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Article III standing requires a particularized determination of whether a specific state official will redress the plaintiff’s injury by following a favorable declaratory judgment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Cunningham v. Cornell University, No. 23-1007 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:30:44

6 weeks1:30:44

1:30:44

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) , or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision’s text. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239 [Arg: 1.22.2025] 1:15:57

6 weeks1:15:57

1:15:57

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts should apply the "moment of the threat" doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, No. 23-1226 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:13:53

6 weeks1:13:53

1:13:53

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., No. 23-1187 [Arg: 1.21.2025] 1:12:12

6 weeks1:12:12

1:12:12

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit (other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122 [Arg: 1.15.2025] 2:05:32

6 weeks2:05:32

2:05:32

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review, instead of strict scrutiny, to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, No. 23-971 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 49:01

8 weeks49:01

49:01

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) . ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Supreme Court of the United States

1
Thompson v. U.S., No. 23-1095 [Arg: 1.14.2025] 1:17:03

8 weeks1:17:03

1:17:03

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Üdvözlünk a Player FM-nél!

A Player FM lejátszó az internetet böngészi a kiváló minőségű podcastok után, hogy ön élvezhesse azokat. Ez a legjobb podcast-alkalmazás, Androidon, iPhone-on és a weben is működik. Jelentkezzen be az feliratkozások szinkronizálásához az eszközök között.

Hallgasson 500+ témát

32 subscribers

Hasonló a(z) Supreme Court of the United States sorozathoz

TurboTax Deluxe 2024 Tax Software, Federal & State Tax Return [PC/MAC Download]

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Mighty Patch™ Original patch from Hero Cosmetics - Hydrocolloid Acne Pimple Patch for Covering Zits and Blemishes in Face and Skin, Vegan-friendly and Not Tested on Animals (36 Count)

Podcastok, amelyeket érdemes meghallgatni

Supreme Court of the United States « » Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]

Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]

Podcastok, amelyeket érdemes meghallgatni

Üdvözlünk a Player FM-nél!

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Crocs Unisex-Child Classic Clogs, Black/Black, 4 Big Kid

Amazon Basics Multipurpose Copy Printer Paper, 8.5 x 11 inches, 20 lb, 1 Ream, 500 Sheets, 92 Bright, White

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Hasonló a(z) Supreme Court of the United States sorozathoz

Gyors referencia kézikönyv

Supreme Court of the United States « »
Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]