Ep. 209 - Precedential Decisions from 4/22/2024 - 4/28/2024 (FTCA; de minimis harm; colorable question of law; time limit on discretion; qualifying relative; non-LPR cancellation of removal; age out; 4,000 cap; BIA notice of appeal requirements; nexus)

Immigration Review

Queen v. United States, No. 22-30294 (5th Cir. Apr. 24, 2024)

• FTCA; prisoner claims; de minimis harm

Ndlovu v. Garland, No. 23-2208 (7th Cir. Apr. 25, 2024)

• justification; Patel; colorable question of law; time limit on discretion

Rangel-Fuentes v. Garland, No. 23-9511 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024)

• qualifying relative; non-LPR cancellation of removal; age out; 4,000 cap; BIA notice of appeal requirements; nexus

Sponsors and friends of the podcast!
Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.
Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.
Docketwise
"Modern immigration software & case management"
Driftwood Capital
"A vertically integrated powerhouse in commercial real estate, developing hospitality
projects for families seeking a secure EB-5 residency path."
Filevine
"Your Complete Legal Tech Stack, Supercharged by AI"

• Promo: Immigration.AI/ImmigrationReview

Stafi
"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"

• Promo Code: stafi2024
• Get Started! Promo Code: FREE

Want to become a patron?

• Click here to check out our Patreon Page!

CONTACT INFORMATION
Email: [e-mail]
Facebook: @immigrationreview
Instagram: @immigrationreview
Twitter: @immreview

• About your host
• Case notes
• Recent criminal-immigration article (p.18)
• Featured in San Diego Voyager

DISCLAIMER & CREDITS
See Eps. 1-200
Support the Show.

Fejezetek

1. Queen v. United States (5th Cir. Apr. 24, 2024) (00:03:20)

2. Ndlovu v. Garland (7th Cir. Apr. 25, 2024) (00:08:06)

3. Rangel-Fuentes v. Garland (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024) (00:15:38)