Artwork

A tartalmat a Atheist Community of Austin biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Atheist Community of Austin vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast alkalmazás
Lépjen offline állapotba az Player FM alkalmazással!

SCOTUS to Hear Case Regarding Emergency Abortions

18:15
 
Megosztás
 

Manage episode 417208225 series 2487204
A tartalmat a Atheist Community of Austin biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Atheist Community of Austin vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortions
The Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctors
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene
The discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.
The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.
The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.
The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.
Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
  continue reading

663 epizódok

Artwork
iconMegosztás
 
Manage episode 417208225 series 2487204
A tartalmat a Atheist Community of Austin biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Atheist Community of Austin vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortions
The Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctors
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene
The discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.
The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.
The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.
The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.
Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
  continue reading

663 epizódok

Minden epizód

×
 
Loading …

Üdvözlünk a Player FM-nél!

A Player FM lejátszó az internetet böngészi a kiváló minőségű podcastok után, hogy ön élvezhesse azokat. Ez a legjobb podcast-alkalmazás, Androidon, iPhone-on és a weben is működik. Jelentkezzen be az feliratkozások szinkronizálásához az eszközök között.

 

Gyors referencia kézikönyv