Artwork

A tartalmat a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast alkalmazás
Lépjen offline állapotba az Player FM alkalmazással!

'Terrorism of the Islamic State: Legal considerations and social media strategies’: The Wilberforce Society

37:48
 
Megosztás
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on January 16, 2025 15:36 (18h ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 456382151 series 2681418
A tartalmat a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
The Wilberforce Society held presentation of a paper written by a team from the University of Cambridge, at the Roger Needham Room in Wolfson College on Wednesday 29 April 2015. Terrorism. Twitter. Arbitrary convictions. Big data. Protests. The Islamic State. Japanese parodies. Detailed analysis of legislative procedures. This paper has it all. Our authors explore the impact of recent case laws, R v Gul and R v Miranda, in the context of the UK’s Terrorism Act, which has resulted in the UK having some of the world’s most arbitrary terrorism legislation. Looking at legislative frameworks from the US and Australia, they propose ways in which the UK could improve its own framework while retaining maximum deterrent and prosecutorial efficiency. Further examining the social media techniques that the Islamic State has mastered to expand its online campaign, they explore possible counter-measures. The paper was discussed by Dr Kimberley Trapp, Public Law specialist at University College London, and former affiliated lecturer at the Cambridge Faculty of Law. During Dr Trapp's doctoral studies, she worked for Vice-President Al-Kasawneh and Judge Simma at the International Court of Justice, and she has published widely on issues relating to the use of force, state responsibility, and the interaction between International Humanitarian Law and terrorism suppression. For more information about the Wilberforce Society, see http://thewilberforcesociety.co.uk/
  continue reading

553 epizódok

Artwork
iconMegosztás
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on January 16, 2025 15:36 (18h ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 456382151 series 2681418
A tartalmat a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a Daniel Bates and Cambridge University vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
The Wilberforce Society held presentation of a paper written by a team from the University of Cambridge, at the Roger Needham Room in Wolfson College on Wednesday 29 April 2015. Terrorism. Twitter. Arbitrary convictions. Big data. Protests. The Islamic State. Japanese parodies. Detailed analysis of legislative procedures. This paper has it all. Our authors explore the impact of recent case laws, R v Gul and R v Miranda, in the context of the UK’s Terrorism Act, which has resulted in the UK having some of the world’s most arbitrary terrorism legislation. Looking at legislative frameworks from the US and Australia, they propose ways in which the UK could improve its own framework while retaining maximum deterrent and prosecutorial efficiency. Further examining the social media techniques that the Islamic State has mastered to expand its online campaign, they explore possible counter-measures. The paper was discussed by Dr Kimberley Trapp, Public Law specialist at University College London, and former affiliated lecturer at the Cambridge Faculty of Law. During Dr Trapp's doctoral studies, she worked for Vice-President Al-Kasawneh and Judge Simma at the International Court of Justice, and she has published widely on issues relating to the use of force, state responsibility, and the interaction between International Humanitarian Law and terrorism suppression. For more information about the Wilberforce Society, see http://thewilberforcesociety.co.uk/
  continue reading

553 epizódok

Minden epizód

×
 
Loading …

Üdvözlünk a Player FM-nél!

A Player FM lejátszó az internetet böngészi a kiváló minőségű podcastok után, hogy ön élvezhesse azokat. Ez a legjobb podcast-alkalmazás, Androidon, iPhone-on és a weben is működik. Jelentkezzen be az feliratkozások szinkronizálásához az eszközök között.

 

Gyors referencia kézikönyv

Hallgassa ezt a műsort, miközben felfedezi
Lejátszás