))
Philosophy vs Science and Godlike Presences
Manage episode 326689546 series 3342726
A tartalmat a la rry and La rry biztosítja. Az összes podcast-tartalmat, beleértve az epizódokat, grafikákat és podcast-leírásokat, közvetlenül a la rry and La rry vagy a podcast platform partnere tölti fel és biztosítja. Ha úgy gondolja, hogy valaki az Ön engedélye nélkül használja fel a szerzői joggal védett művét, kövesse az itt leírt folyamatot https://hu.player.fm/legal.
Philosophy vs Science and Godlike Presences
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_idealism
Introduction
philosopher George Berkeley believed that Locke's Essay did not carry the principles of empiricism far enough.
Lockes Essay
Locke said that a material thing does not necessary has only primary Settings that the material itself defines (like color) , but the mind of someone -
Instead its splitted into three categories
1. Material
2. Perceive of the Object
3. Circumstances while perceiving
Immaterialism
Berkeleys Claim was that theres only perception, nothing like material itself and it would disappear if no one is looking at it
The Idea was based on the splitting of material and immaterial world- as one couldnt tell if something is real when only having his own mind to figure it out. Thats where Science jumps in
The Quantum View of the Theory
https://phys.org/news/2015-01-atoms.html
In Quantum Science, objects can exist in different states of being until they are watched by someone, which would define a static state of being.
Conclusion
Sciences is not completly contrary to Berkeley , as he states its all cause of the presence of Gods Mind.
This might be interesting for someone to argument about a godly ecistence proven by science, as always its up to you what to believe
50 epizódok
Megosztás
