Civil Discourse nyilvános
[search 0]
Több
Download the App!
show episodes
 
Artwork

1
Civil Discourse

Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh

Unsubscribe
Unsubscribe
Heti
 
This podcast uses government documents to illuminate the workings of the American government, and offer context around the effects of government agencies in your everyday life.
  continue reading
 
"Civil Discourse: This is Not a Safe Space” is the conversation we’ve all been wanting… needing to have… but forgot how to have it. In this show for our time, Charles and Mike take on a wide range of challenging, topical, and often divisive issues from Oscar incivility to the culture of police brutality to ill-mannered children, failing education, and misguided parenting. Bringing the diversity of their experiences to the table, these to unlikely friends are a much-needed reminder that we ca ...
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
Civil Discourse | Progressive Radio; Grassroots media; current events; history; Democrat views; Republican views; liberal; conservative

Civil Discourse | Progressive Radio; left wing radio; current events; history; democrat; republican; liberal; conservative; talk radio

Unsubscribe
Unsubscribe
Havi
 
Civil Discourse is the most informative Progressive Radio Show in Wisconsin. A grassroots radio program featuring Senator Peter Bear and Eric Brant. 30 years separate these two co-hosts, offering a unique dynamic to the program. Learn about current events from a historical angle. Hear from state senators, representatives, local politicians, activists, and historians to better understand our current political environment. Gain a better understanding of how political decisions affect everyday ...
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
Aughie and Nia review the following rulings: Alexander v. NAACP; Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) v. Consumer Financial Services Association of America; Muldrow v. City of St. Louis; O'Connor Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed; Donal Trump v. Norma Anderson; FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.…
  continue reading
 
Aughie and Nia discuss the importance of Judge Aileen Cannon's ruling in the Florida documents case against former President Donald Trump. The 93 page ruling relies heavily on a dissent written by Justice Scalia in Morrison v. Olson, one that has waxed and waned in support since 1988.Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
Nia and Aughie discuss the federal legislation signed by President Biden that requires TikTok to sell to a different owner. They also discuss the national security implications as well as the Commerce Clause implications of the legislation. Episode was created May 1, 2024.Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
In part 2 of a 2 part series, Nia and Aughie again host political science professor Chris Saladino to discuss the differences between political science terms such as communism, socialism, dictatorships, and authoritarians. **some adult language is used in this episodeNia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
In part 1 of a 2 part series, Nia and Aughie host political science professor Chris Saladino to discuss the differences between political science terms such as communism, socialism, dictatorships, and authoritarians. **some adult language is used in this episodeNia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
Aughie and Nia welcome Political Science professor Chris Burdett to continue their discussion regarding the way the United Kingdom's Parliament works, and whether the methods of lawmaking in the Parliament have anything in common with the United States Congress.Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
Aughie and Nia discuss the court cases that question whether former President Donald Trump can be on the 2024 Presidential ballot due to allegations of insurrection. They also discuss the question of whether the courts should be ruling on this topic.Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
Aughie and Nia delve into the Mountain Valley Pipeline deal during the debt ceiling debates, and the problems that Congress has made for the Courts in adjudicating any problems with the pipeline. Does the Congress have the power to direct which Court will hear a case?Nia Rodgers and Dr. John Aughenbaugh által
  continue reading
 
Loading …

Gyors referencia kézikönyv